Conflict of Jurisdiction: When Village Regulations Conflict with Decisions of Customary Institutions in the Implementation of Village Autonomy

Authors

  • Marwiah'tul Adawiyah Rumkel Institut Ilmu Hukum dan Teknologi Pembangunan Papua (IHTP) Author
  • Muhammad Zakiyurrahman Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Muhammadiyah Kediri Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67462/15s6t806

Keywords:

authority dissonance, village regulations, customary law, village autonomy, legal pluralism

Abstract

Village autonomy, as guaranteed by Law No. 6 of 2014, affords village governments the scope to draft Village Regulations; however, in many customary areas, this scope overlaps with a system of norms that has long been in place and recognised, namely the decisions of customary institutions. This article examines the phenomenon of a clash of authority that arises when these two sources of law intersect, or even conflict, in the practice of village governance. Employing a normative-juridical approach combined with empirical observation of practices in several customary based villages, this study identifies four patterns of dissonance: normative, institutional, procedural, and legitimacy related. The findings indicate that this dissonance stems from weak formal synchronization mechanisms between village legal instruments and the outcomes of customary deliberations, as well as from regulatory ambiguity regarding the status of customary law communities within the village governance system. This article argues that resolving conflicts of authority cannot be achieved through a subordinative approach that positions customary law merely as a supplement to Village Regulations; instead, a model of complementary relationships is required one that recognizes the equal authority of customary institutions within specific domains. The article’s contribution lies in proposing an analytical framework to reinterpret the relationship between the state and customary systems at the village level in a more contextual manner.

References

Dewi, A. A. I. A. A. (2014). Eksistensi otonomi Desa Pakraman dalam perspektif pluralisme hukum. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2014.v03.i03.p13

Pradhani, S. I. (2021). Pendekatan pluralisme hukum dalam studi hukum adat: Interaksi hukum adat dengan hukum nasional dan internasional. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 81–124.

Vel, J. A. C., & Bedner, A. W. (2015). Decentralisation and village governance in Indonesia: The return to the nagari and the 2014 Village Law. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(3), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2015.1109379

Vel, J. A. C., Zakaria, R. Y., & Bedner, A. W. (2017). Law-making as a strategy for change: Indonesia's new Village Law. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 4(2), 447–471. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.21

von Benda-Beckmann, F., & von Benda-Beckmann, K. (2013). Political and legal transformations of an Indonesian polity: The Nagari from colonisation to decentralisation. Cambridge University Press.

Davidson, J. S., Henley, D., & Moniaga, S. (Eds.). (2010). Adat dalam politik Indonesia. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Safitri, M., & Uliyah, L. (2014). Adat di tangan pemerintah daerah: Panduan penyusunan produk hukum daerah untuk pengakuan dan perlindungan hak masyarakat hukum adat. Epistema Institute.

Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 7.

Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Pasal 18B ayat (2).

Downloads

Published

2026-08-19

How to Cite

Conflict of Jurisdiction: When Village Regulations Conflict with Decisions of Customary Institutions in the Implementation of Village Autonomy. (2026). Law Economic of Government, 1(1), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.67462/15s6t806